Here are the rules of the blog concerning reader comments. And, for the record, I’ve basically lifted — with some adaptations — the excellent comments policy that the Women in Theology authors use for their blog.


At, I believe that robust theological reflection is characterized by collaboration and dialogue. I am committed to creating a safe space for discussions that are open, challenging and respectful.

Disagreement is a necessary and fruitful part of this process. It is most productive when all parties agree to assume good faith. The people who post on this blog, and people who comment on it, do so in order to seek greater understanding and contribute positively to theological, spiritual, cultural and political reflection. Each party will assume that any response to her work has this positive goal in mind, even if it takes the form of a negative critique. In order to preserve the possibility of this assumption, any negative critiques should be directed to particular claims and, where possible, cite directly from the text in question. No ad hominem arguments will be accepted.

Policy on Discrimination

Comments submitted with overtly discriminatory or prejudiced language will be promptly removed. While it is understood that ecclesial and political discussion might necessarily engender heated debate — a welcome dimension of this blog — the author(s) of this blog will not tolerate inappropriate remarks rooted in intolerance of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nation of origin or any other category of this sort.

Screening of All Comments

It is the policy of to automatically screen comments for approval prior to their publication. In order to maintain this safe space, comments on this blog are approved by the author before they are posted. You may direct questions or concerns about this policy to Fr. Daniel P. Horan, OFM for further clarification.

Prior to August 2012 it was the policy of to automatically screen the first comment of a new commenter and then permit the automatic commenting capability for subsequent posts. However, the policy at has since been revised to require prior approval of all comments. In the spirit of the blog’s mission, opposing views will be most welcome and approved for viewing. We are more committed, though, to maintaining a respectful dialogue and atmosphere of discussion, so what might have passed before will not necessarily suffice in terms of language, tone, and attitude. Anonymous posters, particularly within contentious fora, are not welcome — please include your first and last names. Please feel free to raise challenges and offer critiques, but do so in a respectful, dignified, and polite manner!

Welcome to!
Peace and all Good!



  1. Dan,
    This morning i sent a recent article from the NCR by Eugene Kennedy with my positive comments to many of them. A member of HNP one of my long time friends sent me the address to your blog. I found it very interesting with a wealth of information unable to be digested in one sitting. I have bookmarked it and will come back frequently.
    I would be interested in your comments and observations on the translation of the new Missal and its projected implementation.
    As far as I am concerned it is another step designed by the Vatican to deny the results of Vatical II and bring us back to the theology and liturgy of Vatical I if not Trent.
    Pax et Bonum,
    Bill Taylor

  2. Read Dating God at the suggestion of a friend during the breakdown of my marriage. Helped me come to a clearer understanding of the place my relationship with God needed to have in my life. Thank you for your unique insights.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s