jesus-painting_1280_x_1024Jesus was not such a “nice guy.”

This might be difficult to accept at first glance, because the image of Jesus we have today has been so sanitized and packaged as to make wearing a precious-metal cross around one’s neck or identifying oneself as a Christian in public is not a particularly uncommon (nor unpopular) thing to do today, especially in places like the United States. But who is this Jesus that is so immediately attractive, so easy to follow, so much like our own imagining? And, then, who is this Jesus that we hear about in today’s Gospel, who claims to have come to bring division rather than the establishment of peace (Luke 12: 49-53)?

There are at least two reasons we might understand that Jesus was not entirely a “nice guy.” The first is that the Romans, despite anachronistic misunderstandings of their behavior and outlook, did not typically go around crucifying “nice guys.” Yes, while Jesus was without a doubt an innocent man who happened to be crucified, we should not forget that there was a reason that he drew attention to himself and it wasn’t for saying kind things about the way the status quo was maintained. More on that in a second.

The second reason that we can reasonably assume Jesus was not such a “nice guy” is that he tells us as much in today’s Gospel selection from Luke (and we hear it echoed in the synoptic Gospel of Matthew with an even-more disturbing emphasis on not-nice-guyness in terms of Jesus’s claim to bring “the sword”).

It can be difficult to get beyond the seemingly violent message that Jesus appears to convey in his exhortation to his disciples. We might hear in Jesus’s admittance that he didn’t come to “establish peace on the earth” something of an advocation for violence. But that’s not really what is going on.

Likewise, it might seem that Jesus does not respect “family values” (isn’t that an interesting read) in suggesting that those who follow him and live life according the Good News he announces will find themselves among divided families and communities. But that’s not really what is going on.

What is going on is a straightforward, albeit counterintuitive, admission of the risk, challenge, and reality of authentic Christian living that centers on following the Word of God and becoming a prophetic in one’s time and place!

In other words, we are called, like Jesus was, to not be “nice guys” (and “gals,” for those who aren’t Millennials and use “guys” in an inclusive manner).

Jesus did indeed come to bring peace, but it was — as we hear elsewhere in Sacred Scripture — a “peace the world cannot give” (John 14:27). The peace that Jesus is talking about here, the “peace” that he did not come to establish, is the kind of peace that we might talk about when we express a desire to maintain the status quo or wish “not to ‘rock the boat.'” It is a kind of “keeping the peace” that eschews “tough love,” or a “challenging voice,” or the “hard truth.” It is a kind of “establishing a peace” that exists according to the wisdom of the world and not the foolishness of God, and rests in the reason of human injustice and not within the Reign of God.

Jesus was crucified, in part, because he did not come to preach a word that kept things the way they were, but instead was sent to proclaim the in-breaking of God’s Reign, which is about the establishment of justice and not the earthly status quo of injustice and violence. In other words, Jesus was not sent to be a “nice guy,” because nice guys don’t rock the boat nor do they upset people by challenging the way things are. And, oh, how Jesus upset certain people who had so much to lose because they had gained all — power, wealth, status, etc. — at the expense of others!

As those who bear the name of Christ and claim to be his disciples, we are called to not be “nice guys” like him. We are not to keep the peace of things as they are, but to open our eyes to the plight of the poor and forgotten, the underserved and abused, the marginalized and those suffering at the hands of others’ greed. And this might mean that we face divided families and communities, unsettling those who are not able or willing to hear the Gospel.

This is not an entirely new concept. It dates back to the Hebrew Prophets, such as Jeremiah, who we hear about in our First Reading. Jeremiah, a reluctant prophet who at first resisted God’s call to preach the truth of God’s justice and peace, is threatened with death by the king. His proclaiming the truth of the world as it really is in contradistinction to the way God intended the world to be is a threat to those in power, who benefit from the oppression of others and the maintaining of the status quo.

Like Jeremiah, we too might be reluctant to take on this mission, but like him and Jesus we have been called by God to do just that, to surrender our desire to be “nice guys” who “keep the peace” of the way things are. Instead, we are meant — by virtue of our baptismal vocation — to preach the Kingdom of God in word and deed, risking greatly.

But how can we do this?

It is certainly not easy, which is why in our Second Reading the author of the Letter to the Hebrews reminds us of the “Great Cloud of Witnesses” we have to provide models and guides for us. This is a way of talking about the Communion of Saints, those who have gone before us and remain connected to us in spirit. They support us as we continue to persevere and “run the race” of Christian living, a marathon to be sure, a journey that is tiring but one that is the most authentic way of being ourselves.

The question we are left with this weekend is to discern what it means to be a Christian. Do we take the risk of being the prophet who speaks the hard truth and does the right thing, or do we prefer to not “rock the boat” and establish an earthly peace that maintains the status quo of violence and injustice?

Photo: Stock


  1. Thank you, Fr. Dan. This is clearly a much-needed interpretation of today’s Gospel — one of several Gospel accounts in which Jesus’ words and actions are difficult to understand or to situate in our place and time.

    For me, maintaining the status quo and ‘rocking the boat’ apply to my own Catholic Church as well. We have much internal ‘housekeeping’ to do within our Body and that requires courageous prophetic voices.

  2. Jesus is and was a very nice guy! He took God’s Word very serious no matter what the cost. It displeased others to simply hear the truth and Jesus was willing to pay the consequences no matter what others thought. He was truth and BOLD. He hid nothing. He had a job to do for God and obeyed Him in everything God commanded Him to do. He was more than nice. He loved/loves deeply. Never to be miss understood! ❤

    1. It appears you missed the point. You are correct, Jesus was not a “jerk” (as in the other meaning of “not a nice guy”). Rather, the point here is that he wasn’t focused on “keeping the peace” of his time by ignoring the ways reality did not align with God’s will — and this Gospel passage from Luke highlights his awareness of the division his living authentically would cause. He strove not to be a “nice guy” but to be most authentically human in terms of living in the image and likeness of God.

  3. I don’t agree with this point. The stance of “how dare we try to keep ‘status quo’ lets preach like Jesus did and said to!”. The thing to stress that Jesus did was BE PERFECT first. He was the epitome of love and holiness. So now he had the right to give the light and preach love. But this post says shake things up! That’s wrong approach to start. We need to first be the light in our lives. Every singe day people should go WHOA that’s a loving, holy man right there. Wow, look at that humbleness. What is the matter with him, why is so bright? I feel like so many Christians are taught more how to go out and tell others what’s wrong with themselves instead of first offering companionship and love. Instead of offering mercy, comfort, unity.

    Instead, people want to ‘shake things up’ and really slap the sin out of people. And that is Pride. Beware.

    1. Again, it seems the point has been missed here. There is no advocation for “shaking things up,” but a recognition in what Jesus is actually acknowledging (and Jeremiah in the First Reading was experiencing) that to live our truest human and Gospel vocation will necessarily (a) cause division, (b) shake things up when the opposite (being a “nice guy”) would only keep the status quo, and (c) perhaps even risk our lives like Jesus and Jeremiah. Absolutely nowhere in this post or on this blog have you ever read a statement like the one you suggest at the end of your comment (i.e., “Instead, people want to ‘shake things up’ and really slap the sin out of people.”) — please read more carefully before posting remarks.

  4. Matthew 10:34 — “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
    John 15:6 — “If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned.”
    Luke 12:47 – “The servant who knows the master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what the master wants will be beaten with many blows.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s