gun-guns-ammoAt the end of December, Mark Shields, a PBS commentator, said on the PBS NewsHour that since 1968 “more Americans have died from gunfire than died in … all the wars of this country’s history.” There has been some interesting response to that claim, because it seems somewhat hyperbolic. That is, until you look at the actual numbers. The Pulitzer-Prize Winning PolitiFact, a fact-checking organization, consulted the numbers of US casualties from all of the wars in which the United States had been involved dating back to the Revolutionary War and compared the total number of deaths from war with the reported deaths caused by gun violence in the United States since the year 1968 until now.

The facts are startling.

Here is the complete PolitiFact report:

The summary is that there have been nearly 1.4 million deaths on record caused by firearms in the United States since 1968 compared to the nearly 1.2 million US casualties over the course of the nation’s entire history.

These fact-checking details come during the same week that Father Federico Lombardi, S.J., director of the Press Office of the Holy See (the Vatican), wrote an editorial in the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, which stated:

The initiatives announced by the United States government in view of limiting and controlling the diffusion and use of arms are certainly a step in the right direction. It is estimated that Americans today possess about 300 million firearms. No one can be under the illusion that limiting their number and use would be enough to impede horrendous massacres in the future, such as the one in Newtown, which shook the conscience of Americans and of the world, of children and adults alike. But it would be much worse if we were to satisfy ourselves with only words. And if the massacres are carried out by people with mental illness or distorted by hate, there is no doubt that they are carried out with arms. Forty-seven religious leaders of various confessions and religions have issued a call to American politicians to limit firearms, which “are making society pay an unacceptable price in terms of massacres and senseless deaths.” I’m with them.

Lombardi goes on to direct our focus to the broader concern about violence around the world.

But while American society is engaged in this debate of dutiful civil and moral growth, we cannot but widen our gaze to recall that arms, throughout the world, are also instruments for legitimate defense, but surely they are everywhere the main instruments used to bring threats, violence and death. Therefore, it is necessary to repeat tirelessly our calls for disarmament, to oppose the production, trade, and smuggling of arms of all types, fuelled by dishonourable interests for power or financial gain. If results are achieved, such as international conventions, the ban of landmines and other deadly arms, the reduction of the immense and disproportionate number of nuclear warheads…all the better! But weapons are and will always be too many. As the Pope said while travelling to Lebanon, we are all distraught by the massacres in Syria, but the weapons continue to arrive. Peace is born from the heart, but it will be easier to achieve if we have fewer weapons in hand.

We would be wise to pause and reflect on this information, both the disturbing reality of the reach and effect of gun violence in the United States and the encouragement that those, like Lombardi and other religious leaders, offer us to reduce weapons in our nation and around the world.

For all those who are thinking about “life issues” today, don’t leave the victims of gun violence out of your thoughts and prayers. To be “pro-life” is also to be anti-gun.

Photo: Stock


  1. If these figures are accurate does this mean we should also ban other inanimate objects, e.g. cars because of the number of deaths attributed to the use of them? Are there legitimate use of firearms? I am not Franciscan but is there a place for self defense within the Franciscan tradition- I know the issue has been addressed before in the catechism and I believe the writing of St. Thomas Aquinas.

      1. You are correct in what you say to a point. My point is that people think that banning guns will solve the problem of violence- blame the object and not holding people responsible for their actions are part of the problem in our society today. It is an issue that requires a change of heart in the person, something no law will ever do. The sole purpose of a gun is not to kill a living being. It has many purposes from providing recreational shooting, for example, clay and target shooting which is a competitive sport for many to providing food for some families. Finally, it is also a means to protect one’s family and person from those who would do another harm. The purpose is not to necessarily kill the assailant but to stop them from doing their wicked deed. The Department of Justice in the mid nineties estimated that 1.5-2 million crimes are prevented each year in our country by the use of a firearm (many times not even needed to be fired) by average citizens who exercise their right to own a firearm.

  2. I am been involved in a prayer vigil ministry that goes to the place of the homicide and prays for the family and neighborhood. We gather the people and pray for the victim and the one who shot the other. We have been doing this for 15 years. We have seen so much gun violence during these times, the question is how many guns do people need? The young are being killed by other young. Please Lord, help us to love!

  3. People jump to either ALL guns or NO guns. It’s a balance of the two. Responsible use of weapons is now required. Yes, we have the right to own one.

    We do NOT have the right to own one and “accidentally” shoot it at gun shows or have it available to untrained and undeveloped youth or unstable people (which is a lot of people sometimes).

    Progunners forget that even if we can still have assault guns. The government will still have jet fighters and chinnooks, which mutes the arguement for citizen defense from the government.

    We all get pissed or mad or impulsive. It is smart business to have some lock-step safety measures in place.

    The worst thing gunners can do is push back harder. The smartest solution for 2nd Amendment brothers is to offer compromising solutions.

    No compromise? Then, look over your shoulder because most Americans think stricter is smarter.

    Just because we all have equal rights does not mean we are equal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s