Franciscan Friars Speak Out on Behalf of LCWR

Franciscan Leadership Declares Solidarity With Catholic Sisters

American Provinces Release Letter to the LCWR  

NEW YORK — June 7, 2012 — As follow-up to the recent Vatican assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), the leaders of seven entities of Franciscan friars have released a letter to the Catholic sisters expressing their strong support.

Several weeks ago, the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) released its assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, the support system and public voice of some 1500 leaders of women’s congregations, representing over 80% of the women religious in the United States. This assessment was highly critical of the LCWR and demanded changes in its organization and activities. Like many American Catholics, Franciscan friars across the country have been deeply concerned by this document, especially its impact on their sisters in religious life, many of whom belong to Franciscan congregations.

The provincial ministers of the seven provinces of the Order of Friars Minor in the United States, representing more than 1250 religious men, released the following statement to express their appreciation of the invaluable ministry of American religious women and to extend their support to the members of the LCWR, as they attempt to respond to the concerns expressed in the Vatican directives

———————————————————————————————————————

May 31, 2012

Open Letter to the United States Catholic Sisters

We, the Leadership of the Friars Minor of the United States, write today as your brothers in the vowed religious life who, like you, have great love for our Church and for the people whom we are privileged to serve.  We write at a time of heightened polarization and even animosity in our nation and Church, with deep concern that the recent Vatican Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) may inadvertently fuel the current climate of division and confusion.  We write, too, as a public sign of our solidarity with you as you endure this very difficult moment.  We are privileged to share with you the journey of religious life.  Like you, we strive in all that we do to build up the People of God.

As religious brothers in the Franciscan tradition, we are rooted in a stance of gratitude that flows from awareness of the myriad ways that God is disclosed and made manifest in the world.  For us, there can be no dispute that God has been and continues to be revealed through the faithful (and often unsung) witness of religious women in the United States.  Thus we note with appreciation that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) “acknowledges with gratitude the great contributions of women Religious to the Church of the United States as seen particularly in the many schools, hospitals, and institutions of support for the poor which have been founded and staffed by Religious over the years.”  We certainly know how much our service has been enriched by the many gifts you bring to these ministries.

However, your gift to the Church is not only one of service, but also one of courageous discernment.  The late 20th century and the beginning of this century have been times of great social, political and cultural upheaval and change.  Such contextual changes require us, as faithful members of the Church, to pose questions that at first may appear to be controversial or even unfaithful, but in fact are asked precisely so that we might live authentically the charisms we have received, even as we respond to the “signs of the times.”  This is the charge that we as religious have received through the “Decree on the Renewal of Religious Life” from the Second Vatican Council and subsequent statements of the Church on religious life.  We believe that your willingness to reflect on many of the questions faced by contemporary society is an expression of your determination to be faithful to the Gospel, the Church, the invitation from Vatican II and your own religious charisms.  We remain thankful for and edified by your courage to engage in such reflection despite the ever-present risk of misunderstanding.

Moreover, we are concerned that the tone and direction set forth in the Doctrinal Assessment of LCWR are excessive, given the evidence raised.  The efforts of LCWR to facilitate honest and faithful dialogue on critical issues of our times must not result in a level of ecclesial oversight that could, in effect, quash all further discernment.  Further, questioning your adherence to Church teaching by your “remaining silent” on certain ethical issues seems to us a charge that could be leveled against many groups in the Church, and fails to appreciate both the larger cultural context and the particular parameters of expertise within which we all operate.  Finally, when there appears to be honest disagreement on the application of moral principles to public policy, it is not equivalent to questioning the authority of the Church’s magisterium.  Although the Catholic moral tradition speaks of agreement regarding moral principles, it also – from the Middle Ages through today – speaks of appropriate disagreement regarding specific application of these principles.  Unfortunately, the public communications media in the U.S. may not recognize this distinction.  Rather than excessive oversight of LCWR, perhaps a better service to the people of God might be a renewed effort to articulate the nuances of our complex moral tradition.   This can be a teaching moment rather than a moment of regulation — an opportunity to bring our faith to bear on the complexity of public policy particularly in the midst of our quadrennial elections.

Finally, we realize and appreciate, as we are sure do you, the proper and right role of the bishops as it is set out in Mutuae Relationes to provide leadership and guidance to religious institutions.[i]  However, the same document clearly states:

Since it is of utmost importance that the council of major superiors collaborate diligently and in a spirit of trust with episcopal conferences, ‘it is desirable that questions having reference to both bishops and religious should be dealt with by mixed commissions consisting of bishops and major religious superiors, men or women. …Such a mixed commission should be structured in such a way that even if the right of ultimate decision making is to be always left to councils or conferences, according to the respective competencies, it can, as an organism of mutual counsel, liaison, communication, study and reflection, achieve its purpose.  (#63)

We trust that CDF was attempting to follow their counsel from Mutuae Relationes; however, we fear that in today’s public media world their action easily could be misunderstood.  We hope that our bishops will take particular care to see that the way they take action is as important as the actions themselves in serving the People of God.  Otherwise, their efforts will surely be misunderstood and polarizing.

Lastly, we appreciate the approach that you at LCWR have taken to enter into a time of discernment, rather than immediately making public statements that could be construed as “opposing the bishops” after the release of the Doctrinal Assessment.  The rancor and incivility of public conversation in the United States at this time make the possibility of productive dialogue more difficult to achieve.  We pray that the future conversation between LCWR and CDF might provide an example to the larger world of respectful, civil dialog.  Such dialog will require a degree of mutuality, trust and honesty that is absent from much of our world.  We trust that you will continue your efforts to live out this principle, and we trust and pray that our bishops will do the same.

Please be assured of our on-going support, prayers, respect, and gratitude for your living example of the following of Christ in our times.

Fraternally,

Leadership of Franciscan (O.F.M.) Provinces of the United States

Assumption BVM Province
Franklin, WI, U.S.A.

Holy Name Province
New York, NY, U.S.A.

Immaculate Conception Province
New York, NY, U.S.A.

Our Lady of Guadalupe Province
Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A.

Sacred Heart Province
St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

Saint Barbara Province
Oakland, CA, U.S.A.

Saint John the Baptist Province
Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.

UPDATED: A corrected version of the statement was sent out by the communications office of Holy Name Province, New York, NY, on the afternoon of 7 June 2012. The above text reflects the most current edition of the text. A PDF version of the statement is available Here: LCWR_ statement_6-7-12.

[i] Sacred Congregation for Religious and for Secular Institutes, Directives for the Mutual Relations Between Bishops and Religious in the Church, Rome, May 14, 1978

Photo: Stock

17 Responses to “Franciscan Friars Speak Out on Behalf of LCWR”

  1. george bouchey, class of '76 Says:

    This is the message I included when sharing this with a network of friends worldwide:

    What a pleasure it is to know that the Friars who taught me during the many
    years of night school at Siena College are still the same *Shoeless Wonders*
    now that they were then. And know that no disrespect is meant using
    that appellation – it was always used in a spirit of respect and appreciation,
    as it is now! May God continue to bless them with good men, and good
    students!

  2. Sandra Ward Says:

    Everything is so complex and convoluted these days. I think the ONLY way to judge who is right and who is wrong is by looking at their fruits and all the while keeping our eyes on Jesus to know the Will of the Father.

  3. Matthew M. Says:

    I seriously doubt ALL Franciscan Orders are in support of this. Recommend title clarification.

  4. Matthew M. Says:

    Food for thought…..All these reforms, indeed, have contributed and are still contributing to the destruction of the Church, to the ruin of the priesthood, to the abolition of the Sacrifice of the Mass and of the sacraments, to the disappearance of religious life, to a naturalist and Teilhardian teaching in universities, seminaries and catechectics; a teaching derived from Liberalism and Protestantism, many times condemned by the solemn Magisterium of the Church. No authority, not even the highest in the hierarchy, can force us to abandon or diminish our Catholic faith, so clearly expressed and professed by the Church’s Magisterium for nineteen centuries. “But though we,” says St. Paul, “or an angel from heaven preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Gal. 1:8).
    The 1974 Declaration of Archbishop Lefebvre, Econe, Switzerland

  5. Triangle Says:

    For another point of view than the Friars of the Holy Name see
    http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/whats-going-on-with-the-lcwr/
    It is always good to get balance.

    • george bouchey, class of '76 Says:

      I used the URL. I stopped reading when I reached the “brides of Christ”. BTW, what does that make the Friars? The bridegrooms of Christ? The 16th Century was more than a few years ago.

      • Triangle Says:

        I suppose you would like to insult the nun who considers herself that way as well.

  6. Tom O.F.S. Says:

    Sorry, time to unsubscribe.

    All Franciscans are to be obedient to the Magisterium, as Francis taught. Not make Catholicism what they want it to be.

    o•be•di•ence:
    Noun: 1. Compliance with someone’s wishes or orders or acknowledgment of their authority. 2. Submission to a law or rule.

    I made a promise, a profession; you made, they made, a vow.

  7. K. Murphy Says:

    If I were a Franciscan Brother or Priest, faithful to the Magisterium and respectful of its teaching authority, I’d be very sad and disappointed that my Superiors had deigned to speak for me in such a way. The Franciscans continue to morph into the Jesuits (with many exceptions, I pray, in both orders), disdainful of the Vatican’s authority, answerable only to themselves. This statement in not a proud moment.

  8. Triangle Says:

    From reading the letter, it starts out like the friars are concerned about polarization, but, the fact, by submitting this letter in such a public way they are fueling the polarizing. If they had intended to “admonish the sinner” then they perhaps should have done it the way St Paul advises by speaking to who they consider the sinner in private. Perhaps they have, I don’t know but this letter seems to have an alterior motive that is one-sided not the reconciliatory tone that it tries to strike at times. The letter is now being used as a pawn for those outside the Church who would like further division, not those who would like discussion. Disappointing to me.

  9. I find nothing in this letter or its open publication that that is either objectionable or duplicitous. It is good to know that the good sisters have the support of their brethran in religious life. I find the tone to be one of respectful concern for both the sisters and the Vatican. I feel that a quote from John XXIII’s open address to Vatican II is in order here. “We feel we must disagree with those prophets of gloom, who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world were at hand… The Church has always opposed errors. Frequently she has condemned them with the greatest severity. Nowadays however, the Spouse of Christ prefers to make use of the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. She consider that she meets the needs of the present day by demonstrating the validity of her teaching rather than by condemnations…”

  10. It has been brought to our attention that a great deal of discussion has been launched over the OFM’s (Order of Friars Minor) in the United States declaring solidarity with the radical feminists associated with the Leadership Conference of Woman Religious (LCWR) in direct defiance of the Pope, the Magisterium, and the Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church. Please note that the Third Order Regular (TOR) and all other Franciscan Orders throughout the United States continue to declare their solidarity with the Vatican. Likewise, the Franciscan Lay Apostolate places themselves under strict obedience to the Bishop of Steubenville, the TOR’s and the Vatican.

    Chris Dickson, FLA
    Servant General
    Franciscan Lay Apostolate

  11. Frances Ann Cook, RSm Says:

    As a Sister of Mercy, I am so invigorated by the thoughtful and profound support of the Franciscans in this response. I am so aware of the strength and courage underlying your statement, and so grateful for the reinforcement you give to all of us who claim membership in LCWR. Our respect for you only deepens the value of your words.

    • george bouchey, class of '76 Says:

      Thanks Matthew. The LCWR represents 80% of the Sisters in the US. Sister Mary Rose represents one Order, one which I suspect is not represented in the LCWR. Very impressive. The web site she posted to is also very impressive. At least now if I wish to have God-in-a-box, I know another place where He cannot be found.

      Try the footnotes on this link. It also lists a lot of people/places where God cannot be found. In fact, it is quite representative of what can be found in most of the dioceses in the USA, all of which are in the charge of bishops, not Sisters.

      http://www.snapnetwork.org/coverup_continues

      The Truth will set us free, Matthew. One only needs to give it the opportunity!

      pax – george

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: