I hate to come across in any way that makes it appear as though I am against fondly and respectfully remembering the life and legacy of Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, who died this week at the age of 56. He was far too young and it is sad that someone so creative, talented and iconic passed from this life to the next after such a short period of time. But Jobs wasn’t the only one who died on Wednesday. While the Washington Post, the New York Times and other major news outlets (on and offline) blasted news stories and feature presentations related to the death of Jobs, a much smaller headline ran, largely unnoticed.

Fred L. Shuttlesworth, a pioneer and central leader in the United States Civil-Rights Movement died at the age of 89.

His legacy, which included risking his life, being imprisoned, inspiring the work of others who received more credit — such as Martin Luther King, Jr., was remembered with nearly no fanfare, little Internet and media coverage, and only the most nominal of acknowledgements in the press. It was thanks to the reminder of Prof. Ed McCormack of the Washington Theological Union that the significance of Rev. Shuttlesworth’s death really struck a chord. Even I had been swept away with the hype of Jobs’s death — mostly becoming upset with the disturbingly disproportionate attention it received vis-á-vis other world issues — and, although I had been aware of Shuttlesworth’s death, had nearly as quickly forgotten about it as I had heard of it.

Instead of paying the appropriate respect that a man like Shuttlesworth deserves, we — as a society — chose to turn the death of a white male billionaire into a spectacle. I’m not entirely sure what the source of the catharsis is in the metonymic treatment of the Jobs’s death; for what does he represent? Does he represent the young men, the children, the middle-aged citizens of the world who struggle to stay alive this day because of cancer or other terminal illnesses? Does he represent the justice and courage that Rev. Shuttlesworth’s legacy presents to a generation that ignores his passing from this life to the next?  I don’t think so. If it were the case, I think I might feel differently about the bizarre behavior that has been exhibited today in what I can only describe as idolatry-turned-normative: the flowers and candles at Apple stores, the reverenced cadence of a Jobs invocation, the treatment of Apple products as second-class relics of a saint who bestowed his blessings on the life of the consumer.

I have nothing against Steve Jobs — in fact, I type these comments on a MacBook Pro — but I am scandalized, frankly, Horrified by the disparity in the treatment of the deaths of two public figures on the same day. Here’s some of what the New York Times said today (Thursday) in its obituary for Rev. Shuttlesworth (which was not easily found on the website, unlike the ubiquitous Jobs-related news).

It was in that city in the spring of 1963 that Mr. Shuttlesworth, an important ally of Dr. King, organized two tumultuous weeks of daily demonstrations by black children, students, clergymen and others against a rigidly segregated society.

Graphic scenes of helmeted police officers and firefighters under the direction of T. Eugene (Bull) Connor, Birmingham’s intransigent public safety commissioner, scattering peaceful marchers with fire hoses, police dogs and nightsticks, provoked a national outcry.

The brutality helped galvanize the nation’s conscience, as did the Ku Klux Klan’s bombing of a black church in Birmingham that summer, which killed four girls at Sunday school. Those events led to passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, after the historic Alabama marches that year from Selma to Montgomery, which Mr. Shuttlesworth also helped organize. The laws were the bedrock of civil rights legislation.

“Without Fred Shuttlesworth laying the groundwork, those demonstrations in Birmingham would not have been as successful,” said Andrew M. Manis, author of “A Fire You Can’t Put Out,” a biography of Mr. Shuttlesworth. “Birmingham led to Selma, and those two became the basis of the civil rights struggle.”

Mr. Shuttlesworth, he added, had “no equal in terms of courage and putting his life in the line of fire” to battle segregation.

Shuttlesworth is someone for whom we should be hosting candle-light vigils of remembrance and writing blog post after blog post of heartfelt reflection. He is someone who gave of himself, risked his life for others and, even after his death, falls into the subordinated obscurity of a Southern black man who played second-fidle to a white, West-Coast entrepreneur.

Jobs changed the technological landscape that has so irrevocably shifted our own understanding and practice of business, entertainment and communication — but Shuttlesworth risked everything to gain the most basic of rights, without which none of Jobs’s innovations would mean a thing for an African-American person in this country.

Shuttlesworth fought for justice. Jobs fought for market share. Why is it that we’re talking about one of these men and not the other today?

Here’s another short excerpt from the New York Times‘s recounting of Shuttlesworth’s courage and determination in the face of adversity and violence:

In one instance, on Christmas night 1956, he survived an attack in which six sticks of dynamite were detonated outside his parsonage bedroom as he lay in bed. “The wall and the floor were blown out,” Ms. McWhorter wrote, “and the mattress heaved into the air, supporting Shuttlesworth like a magic carpet.”

When he tried to enroll his children in an all-white school in 1957, Klansmen attacked him with bicycle chains and brass knuckles. When a doctor treating his head wounds marveled that he had not suffered a concussion, Mr. Shuttlesworth famously replied, “Doctor, the Lord knew I lived in a hard town, so he gave me a hard head.”

I’m sorry to rain on the parade of the Mac-dirge singers today, but I cannot help but be incredibly disappointed with this sort of celebrity-spectacle. Steve Jobs deserves to be remembered favorably, but at what cost? Who gets forgotten or left aside? What has Jobs done that deserves this sort of reaction?

I think the absurdity reached its height this evening when I saw a well-meaning Catholic campus ministry group announce an “iPhone-lite Memorial Service for Steve Jobs,” exhorting the students to “Come and bring a iPhone or mac product that lights up.” While there may be some students who are shaken up by the realization that Jobs might be a similar age to their parents, and thereby be in need of some sort of ministerial and pastoral care. But, this sort of activity comes across as distasteful when the same sort of assembly is usually called to honor the tragedies of community violence, war, civil unrest, and the ongoing struggle to end injustice in our world. It was precisely this sort of peaceful gathering that Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth would have endorsed to call attention to the ongoing civil injustices in our own day and use that opportunity to speak out and pray for change. What will be the cry of an “iPhone-lite” assembly tonight?

Oh, and by the way, in case you also missed this new story, an elderly half-paralyzed Swedish man, Tomas Transtromer, was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature today. Where will we meet to remember him in a few short years when he too embraces sister death?

Photos: Cincinnati Inquirer and New York Times

9 Comments

  1. Was there not a distantly analogous situation with the deaths of John F. Kennedy, C.S. Lewis, and Aldous Huxley on November 22, 1963?

  2. I have been thinking along the same line, but more focused on the fact that the CBC, BBC and other media keep talking about how much our lives have been changed by the impact of the innovations of Steve Jobs and Apple. I, too, am writing on a MacBook Pro.

    What what about the billions who have never yet had access to virtually any media. It seems that these men, women and children have not been touched by any of these wonderful toys.

  3. I can’t believe I’m saying this but I’m going to have to go with the media on this one.

    I’m typing on a MacBook, and Steve Jobs was 56. I’ve heard about Steve Jobs during my childhood because my Dad has been a Mac user for years. It’s very surprising to me that Steve Jobs died. I expected the media to cover it.

    I’ve never heard of that guy and he was 89. I don’t expect the media to cover it. In fact the world might never notice. But his friends and family knows what he has done and more importantly God knows what he has done and will reward him accordingly. I’m no bible scholar but isn’t there a passage that who ever gets recognized on Earth has received there reward but whoever doesn’t God will reward?

    The media is praising Steve Jobs now but tomorrow it will forget and the day after that it will be saying Apple makes garbage. If this man is half as good as you say he is he will be remembered regardless of how much “airtime” he gets. But it doesn’t matter either way, God never forgets a good deed.

  4. I could not agree more and have actually posted very little other than two quick links about Jobs. I wish him rest and peace and I pray for consolation for all who knew and loved him. Yes – he did change our lives but the adoration is out of proportion.

    Then I think about our consumerist society and the values of the world. That sentence sounds more smarmy than I want it to, but what else can I say?

    We have made a god out of products and materials and while they can change our lives (note, Mac Book Pro here too and it *has* changed my life) , in what ways and how?

    So by making a god of products and commerce too, we do put Jobs in this place by virtue of our missteps as a people.

    With no disrespect for a truly remarkable person who has died, I was reminded as I listened to Marketplace (NPR) last night that despite it looming large, Apple products have relatively small market shares. This is a reminder – for me anyway, maybe you too – that we put on the false self all the time. I know I do and this is the ultimate representation of that in many ways.

    Shuttlesworth on the other hand reminds us of what we are meant to acquire – dignity, justice, hope. Those things cannot come out of a shiny metal box of any size other than through the words, thoughts and actions of humans who might be seen and experienced in those boxes.

    But we would rather love the shiny box and notion of transformation through it rather than the much less appealing idea of what we give up and what we gain through humanity.

    This turned into a rant that I had no idea existed in me… In any event, rest and peace for Fred Shuttlesworth and consolation for all who loved him. He too changed the world, just far more anonymously and may his legacy live on.

  5. Well remember also the big story of the day in the media is covering the trial Michael Jackson’s doctor!?!??!

    I agree, there are serious issues with the priorities, and it starts sadly with the media, has THEY seem to be telling the people what is important.

    However, I do disagree with the anti-capitalism sentiment posed in the other post. I am quite certain, (although I have not researched properly, nor care too), Mr. Jobs probably has done quite a bit of philanthropy over the years. And, just because it did not go through the “government” to help with “social justice” issues, does NOT make him a bad person. The last time I checked, is it not part of our call, to discern our vocation and put our God-given talents to work?

    1. Br. Dan, It seems that the Non-Violence Movement would embrace this opportunity to point out that Steven Jobs was adopted, after his young, unwed mother protected his life. I have unfortunately come to suspect that “non violence” as a movement is really “anti-death penalty and war”, in the same way that “pro-life” as a movement so often simply means anti-abortion. Those who grieve his loss might actually see the life in a totally new and profound way.

  6. I was remarking to my wife about the amount of attention devoted to Steve Jobs. He rose to a cult figure. In true secular fashion, there’s little mention of any moral virtues or sacrifices. Instead he is hailed for ’empowering’ us, being a ‘visionary’ and one who ‘transformed us’ with his business and technological prowess.

    I think this praise of personal empowerment over personal sacrifice creates a moral ambiguity. I don’t wish to criticise Steve Jobs, in many ways his life was praiseworthy. It’s simply a commentary on our culture, which lacks a cadre of saint like figures, to gravitate toward the cult of personality. Often its the cult of dysfunctional personality a la Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, etc.

    Regarding proximate deaths, another stark contrast was the funeral coverage of Princess Diana and Mother Teresa of Calcutta.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s