Archive for Jesus

Between Faith and Belief is Christian Life

Posted in Homilies, Scripture with tags , , , , , , on April 7, 2013 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

the-holy-bibleIt can be difficult to distinguish between what is meant by faith and belief. For some, such a distinction doesn’t exist; to “have faith” means to “believe in X,Y,or Z.” Yet, for others (and I would put myself in this camp) there is an important distinction that must be made, while recognizing that they are interrelated aspects of our lives. Faith does not require the same sort of thing that belief does. And that thing is cognitive, conceptual, thematic, reflexive, explicit, propositional awareness, understanding, or assent related to a claim about Christianity.

We can see this in a more practical way when we pause to consider how we use the two terms in everyday usage. For example, to say that “I have faith that things will work out” suggests that the how or in what way a situation might be resolved doesn’t come to the fore. But to talk about like, “I believe that this thing will happen,” requires a particular object of  consideration.

Faith is much more than belief.

Faith is the grounding of our very selves in the love and existence of God that oftentimes escapes conceptual reflection and concrete expression. It is about the relationship or experience of an encounter with God in our lives and in our world. It is what provides, as Karl Rahner might put it, the very condition for the possibility of belief — the fiducial context out of which our doctrines, scripture, and shared expression of that experience arises.

Just because someone cannot or will not “believe” in something, does not mean that the same person doesn’t intrinsically and in a very profound way have faith.

Perhaps there is no better example of this dynamic of human existence in relationship to God playing out than in our Gospel for this Sunday — the famous encounter (or initial lack thereof) between the Risen Lord and Thomas, called Didymus, and more popularly called “the doubter!”

Thomas’s doubt shouldn’t, I believe, be mistaken for a lack of faith.

Why? Thomas’s faith — that experience of God in Jesus Christ that led him to transform his life (metanoia) in following in the footsteps of the Nazarene — is what brought him to the moment when the question of belief and unbelief arose. I have no doubt that Thomas was well aware of the mystery of God’s action in the world and in his life in particular, but that doesn’t mean that he had an easy time making sense or conceptualizing or understanding what was happening in the everyday, categorical experience of his quotidian life. On the contrary, the author of the Gospel of John tells us that he, like the other disciples, were rather confused, uncertain, and deathly afraid (literally — they feared the same fate as Jesus). He was, like so many women and men — really, like all women and men, unsure of what to believe.

The story traditionally paints Thomas as something of a loser, a “bad guy,” a holdout. But, I think he’s the most genuine figure for which any modern disciple could hope. He is us, and because we are losers or holdouts or weak in faith. On the contrary, the experience of Thomas reveals that just because we have faith in the God who is love, who is our ground, who sustains us and, like we read in Exodus 3:15-17 in the theophany to Moses, is the God who is concerned about us and cares for us, does not mean that our belief in all aspects of our tradition will come easily and that we will always understand what is happening in our lives with clarity.

The end of the Gospel account from John reads:

Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples
that are not written in this book.
But these are written that you may come to believe
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God,
and that through this belief you may have life in his name.

The author of this Gospel seems to make it clear that the purpose of the concretized, historical medium of kerygma or early experience and proclamation of the Christ event, is to serve as a means for Christians who would come after to believe. It presupposes the faith that is intrinsic to each of us by virtue of our being loved into existence by God and, therefore, seeks to help us make sense of what our lives are about, what it is we are supposed to do, and to understand better who God is.

That is the whole point of God becoming a human person in Jesus of Nazareth, something that God planed and desired from all eternity: to enter into an ever-more intimate relationship with all of humanity and creation. That is the point of John 1:18 when the author, at the end of the prologue, explains that the purpose of the Gospel that follows is to present what it means for the Son to reveal (exegete or express) the Father.  That is the point of the Good News (Gospel), to lead our faith to belief, to give an account of what it means to bear the name Christ and to make sense of the faith that is already always present, even if we choose to ignore it.

Thomas isn’t such a bad guy, he’s just very real and extraordinarily normal. He helps show us that what brings us to God through Christ is the faith that is an expression of our a priori relationship with our creator, and that it is then the purpose of the Christian community to encourage one another so that we may then “come to believe” and, then, “through this belief you may have life in his name.”

Photo: Stock

Can You Handle the Truth That Will Set You Free?

Posted in Scripture, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on March 20, 2013 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

boy_reading_bibleJesus says: “If you remain in my word, you will truly be my disciples ,and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:31). But, as if fulfilling the prophecy of Jack Nicholson’s character in the film  A Few Good Men, those who hear Jesus seem quite incapable of “handling the truth.”

The question of Pilate lingers in the background of Jesus’s curious line: quid veritas est? What is this truth about which Jesus is speaking, according to which one who would be his disciple would be set free? It seems that Jesus, in true Johannine form, is both rather straightforward and curiously deceptive about what precisely he means.

To have a better sense of this idea of truth (he aletheia) as it is used in this case. Scholars, in good academic style, are divided on how exactly Jesus is using this notion here. The most plausible referent, however, is very likely the revelation of God in the very person Jesus of Nazareth. His life, words, and deeds as exhibited throughout John’s Gospel — otherwise described as the book of these “signs” — bespeak a truth that cannot be intuited from one’s own experience. Rather, the truth that sets the disciple free is the very “word” of Christ, which in Hebrew (dabar) denotes not just what one says, but action, event, and dynamism as well. In this sense, the opening of John’s Gospel makes more sense than it ordinarily might to our Hellenistic ears: the Word became flesh. The Word acts.

Knowing the dabar of Jesus is to know the fullest revelation of God (see John 1:18 in which we are told at the end of the prologue that “no one has ever seen the Father, but the son reveals Him”), which is both the content of the message and the transformative power of the action.

To know the truth that sets one free is to embrace the relationality of God’s intention for all of humankind. Jesus tries to express this in his dialogue with, interestingly enough, “those who had believed in him” (tous pepisteukotas autq Ioudaious), the group of people he is addressing in this passage. But, like so many who today profess to believe in him or, as the PEW Research polls continually tells us, admit to having had professed belief in him, the audience of Jesus’s time misses the point.

“Oh, I know what it means to follow the Law and to do what God instructed us through Abraham,” they reply. But Jesus tries to get across that something entirely new is unfolding here. What they take to be the instructions according to Abraham their father in faith is, Jesus seems to claim, actually their own misinterpretations and a straying away from what it is that God reveals to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and so on. He says, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works of Abraham” (John 8:39). Instead, if even sincerely, they are doing the works of their own liking, not those revealed by God to their ancestors.

And how true is that for Christians today? We collectively claim, “Oh, we are disciples of Jesus and we do his works!” But do we?

Those who bear the name Christ and call themselves Christian should indeed do his works according to his word (dabar), but so often mistake their own social, cultural, and personal desires for the word of God. This is how self-identified Christians can commit all sorts of hatred, discrimination, and violence. This is how women and men who bear the name “Christ” can judge and exclude, seek wealth and ignore the poor, advance their own power while marginalizing those who already have no voice. This, however, is not the truth about which Jesus speaks.

Jesus’s truth, the truth of the word of God, is a truth of radical relationship and self-sacrificial love (agape). It is a love of neighbor and stranger and enemy that is peace that “the world” cannot give that, as Paul says, is foolishness and stupidity to the world, but is the heart of who God is and who we are called to be. It is a truth that can set us free by unveiling and then removing the strictures we place on ourselves and others in our self-serving actions and attitudes. It is a truth that is not so much easily understood as challengingly lived out.

Photo: Stock

Recognizing Love and Risking Rejection

Posted in Scripture, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on February 4, 2013 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

imagesEarly in this new year I heard a music teacher speak on an NPR program about his New Year’s resolution. While he had spent many years teaching young people how to play instruments and encouraging them through their public performances, he, a cellist by training, had never performed a private recital. This year would be different. It was his goal to finally do that, to prepare the necessary pieces he would publicly perform and take the risk that some will like his musical performance and others might not. He spoke on the radio about both the conscious and unconscious factors that have contributed to years of avoiding taking this risk, of exposing himself to others by vulnerably presenting and performing that about which he cared most deeply. It is very personal, yet it is not unlike the experiences of so many.

In yesterday’s Gospel we get the second half of the narrative that began last week. Jesus, having returned from the desert now filled with the Spirit and ready to begin his public ministry, comes back to his home town. In a public way, he finds himself in a situation where he proclaims a passage from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, a passage that becomes something of Jesus’s mission statement:

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me
to bring glad tidings to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives
and recovery of sight to the blind,
to let the oppressed go free,
and to proclaim a year acceptable to the Lord.

The rest of the Gospel is an account of Jesus living out what he announces in that synagogue. But before he truly begins what he has been sent to do, he exposes himself to those in his home town, to those who know him and to strangers alike.

And many reject him.

When the people in the synagogue heard this,
they were all filled with fury.
They rose up, drove him out of the town,
and led him to the brow of the hill
on which their town had been built,
to hurl him down headlong.

I think this account of the beginning of Jesus’s public ministry, which comes to us in the Gospel according to Luke, presents us — those who profess to follow in the footprints of Christ and bear his name as Christians — with two challenging questions: (a) In whom or what do we place our trust and desire for affirmation? and (b) Are we willing to risk rejection and, by doing so, also risk acceptance?

It can be easy to ignore the mirror this Gospel holds up to the faces of contemporary Christians (I’m talking about you and I in particular). One might wish to read the risk and encounter of rejection Jesus experiences as surmountable because “Jesus was also God, not just human like us.” Certainly it was something divine that allowed Jesus to, as this Gospel passage concludes, just pass through the angry mob and simply walk away. But an overemphasis on Jesus’s uniqueness without due consideration for his 100% humanity is, I believe, just a way for us to make excuses for ourselves.

Where Jesus placed his trust and desire for affirmation is the key, I think, to understanding what was going on here and how it relates to us. Having returned from the desert where Jesus faced the basic temptations that all human beings encounter — wealth, power, security, etc. — he is filled with the Spirit, aware of who he really is because he recognizes his identity and mission through his relationship to the Father.

He doesn’t place his need for affirmation or trust that his self-worth should be decided by others, but instead relies on and is inspired (again, as in “in-spirare” to be filled with the Spirit!) by his True Self found in God alone.

This is what we are reminded of in yesterday’s First Reading from the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah, which opens:

The word of the LORD came to me, saying:
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
before you were born I dedicated you,
a prophet to the nations I appointed you.

The young would-be (and yet, resistant) prophet ultimately recognizes his identity and call to live in the world in a particular way according to who God has created him to be. This identity is born out of a love that is so personal, to intimate, that Jeremiah sees it extending long before the prophet was born.

Jeremiah is empowered to risk rejection, to speak truth to power, to announce the good news of God, because he recognizes the love, worth, dignity, value, and true affection that comes from God. It is in this relationship that Jeremiah places his trust and desire for affirmation, a trust that is maintained and a desire that is abundantly fulfilled.

Jesus and Jeremiah are not so different in this regard. But how do we compare?

Do we narrate stories to ourselves, consciously or in less-conscious ways, about how our worth and affirmation must come from without? Do we make excuses for why we avoid entirely or shrink in the face of difficult situations that might otherwise require us to recognize that we are loved by God and likewise empowered by the Spirit to do what is right and just and prophetic?

Jesus’s mission statement, summarized by the passage from Isaiah, is ours too. And the source of Jeremiah’s prophetic call is the same God who loves each of us into existence and continually graces us with God’s own Spirit to live the life of authentic Christian discipleship, provided we decide to choose that.

As we begin a new week, I wonder about myself and offer the reflection to you too: Do I recognize the love that affirms my truest self and then take the risk that I might be rejected by others?

Perhaps its time, like the cellist, to do what we have known, deep down, that we wanted to do and should have done all along.

Photo: Stock

An Unexpected Model of Discipleship

Posted in Scripture, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on January 16, 2013 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

helping handI used to not like the story in the first part of today’s Gospel passage about the healing of Simon’s Mother-in-law. There was something that struck my modern awareness of the subjugation of women in various times and cultures that suggested her immediate “service” or “waiting on” Jesus, Simon, Andrew, and the gang, right after she was healed from her illness was offensive. That is until I had a better appreciation for what I see as a connection between this passage, which appears in the first chapter of Mark’s Gospel and a passage that appears eight chapters later.

The section that I’m talking about for today reads:

On leaving the synagogue
Jesus entered the house of Simon and Andrew with James and John.
Simon’s mother-in-law lay sick with a fever.
They immediately told him about her.
He approached, grasped her hand, and helped her up.
Then the fever left her and she waited on them. (Mark 1:29-31)

What is interesting about this is that what really is being described here is Simon’s (unfortunately unnamed) mother-in-law’s diakonos. Her “service” or “waiting on” is not simply the labor of someone confined to domestic servitude, doing the stereotypical “woman’s work” of a subjugated First-Century woman, but the action of a disciple following in the truest sense the example and call of Jesus Christ.

It is no accident that she does this immediately after receiving the healing touch of Jesus.

Having been healed of her illness, of her brokenness, of her separation from the life of community in seclusion, she recognizes — perhaps only intuitively, but certainly by the Spirit — that it falls to her to share that healing gift of service, diakonos, with others in return for God’s love and healing.

This is the same language that is used later in Mark’s Gospel when Jesus comes across his bickering disciples on a walk along the road. They fight over “who is the greatest,” and Jesus, drawing on the same action, the same diakonos, of Simon’s mother-in-law, tells the two clueless followers that the greatest disciple is the one who does what Simon’s mother-in-law does: Recognize the healing presence of God in his or her life and then serves others.

It is rather unexpected, I suppose, but a great model no less. Instead of a symbol of subjugation and marginalization, the service (diakonos) of Simon’s mother-in-law is a model of authentic and true Christian discipleship.

Photo: Stock

O Root of Jesse: The God Who Comes From Within

Posted in Advent, O Antiphons, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on December 19, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

community-helping-handsO Root of Jesse, you have been raised up as a sign for all peoples; kings stand silent in your presence; the nations bow down in worship before you. Come, let nothing keep you from coming to our aid.

There is a line that is often attributed to St. Augustine and that others, like St. Bonaventure, later appropriated and paraphrased. It reflects the intimacy and immanence of God: “God is closer to you than you are to yourself.” This year, while reflecting on today’s O Antiphon, O Root of Jesse, I thought of this line because of the way in which the coming of God as emmanuel is anticipated here as coming from within. It is not an utterly transcendent God that comes from outside, as if beaming down from outer space, but a God who comes from within the family of the People of Israel, from within the limitations of human form, from within the time and space of our existence in creation.

This is partly what is conveyed in the reference to the messiah’s coming from the lineage of King David’s father, Jesse. Jesus arrives as a member of that family tree (hence the importance of the ‘boring’ genealogies in Matthew and Luke) and it should indeed give us pause about how we view our families and the importance of that connection with our past, present, and future lineage. Like all of humanity, God enters our world as part of a particular line of human persons with their own diverse histories, blessings, and sinful pasts. God knows a thing or two about what it’s like to be part of a family.

Yet, it is not just those who follow in the line of David that can appreciate that Jesus was born in that line, for the broader human family is what we celebrate on Christmas. Because God enters the world as one like us, it was necessary for there to be a particular family line into which Christ would be born, but it is the fact that God becomes human and, therefore, part of the human family that is so much more significant than any particular clan to which the infant Jesus would be associated.

In light of this familial dimension to the Incarnation and the coming of Christ, I wonder how we might understand the last line of the antiphon: “let nothing keep you from coming to our aid.” Superficially, it almost appears as though we are praying that God doesn’t get stuck in traffic or become distracted by something else or disinterested for some reason. Yet, there is a profound implication that this line bears when we put the whole familial observation in perspective.

Christ continues to come into our world today in many and varied ways, albeit not in quite the same way as that day in Bethlehem. The way that Christ comes into our world to aid us, however, is through the other members of the body of Christ. As Teresa of Avila so brilliantly said:

Christ has no body but yours,
No hands, no feet on earth but yours,
Yours are the eyes with which he looks
Compassion on this world,
Yours are the feet with which he walks to do good,
Yours are the hands, with which he blesses all the world.
Yours are the hands, yours are the feet,
Yours are the eyes, you are his body.
Christ has no body now but yours,
No hands, no feet on earth but yours,
Yours are the eyes with which he looks
compassion on this world.
Christ has no body now on earth but yours.

God is only ever prevented from coming to the aid of humankind by the inaction or disinterest of other human persons. This antiphon reminds us of our familial bond to God in Christ through the Incarnation, but it should also remind us of our role in salvation history to care for one another as Jesus cared for those he encountered during his earthly lifetime.

When we pray for the Root of Jesse to come, we are praying that the Spirit of God take root in our heart so that we can be instruments of God’s peace in this world, allowing God to indeed come to the aid of our brothers and sisters. But it only happens through us. It only happens from the God who comes from within: within human history and within our hearts.

Photo: Stock

On Kings, Kingdoms and Worlds

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on November 25, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Today is marks the last Sunday in the regular church year. Next week, the First Sunday of Advent (I know, when did time fly by so quickly?!), is the transition into the next church year — the “New Year’s Eve” of the Liturgical cycle! But before we start thinking about the coming new church year, I think today’s Gospel selection is well-worth considering as the last proclamation of the Good News for this current year. It comes from the end of the Gospel of John where Pilate is interrogating Jesus during his impromptu trial before the Roman Governor. In response to the question, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus explains: “My Kingdom does not belong to this world” (John 18:36).

For us to consider are two aspects of Jesus’s response, among the many things on which we could reflect from this set of readings. First, there is this business about a Kingdom and a king. Most readers will inevitably think of medieval Britain or the current Saudi monarchies, but Jesus’s response is not at all in the realm of these earthly domains (hence his “not of this world” line).

What is really alluded to here is the Hebrew notion of the malkuth YHWH, the “Reigning of God” (or in the Greek: basileia tou theou). This eschatological image is not “reigning” like Queen Elizabeth II reigns in England, nor is it the dictatorial monarchies of centuries past, but instead has to do with the actualization of God’s will on earth. In other words, it is an expression of what God has intended from all eternity in the creation event, yet because of our finitude and hubris we have not  lived up to our personal and communal vocations to live in the world as if God were reigning. Note the our, meaning human — there are very serious theological questions still open about whether the rest of creation could be implicated in our sinfulness.

My guess, following Francis of Assisi’s notion of the rest of creation’s ability to be what it was intended to be and therefore still able to praise God naturally, is: no, only humanity is responsible here for the stalling of sorts of the basileia tou theou, which is why humanity is the so-called linchpin of salvation. The rest of the created order, as one might flippantly put it, is waiting for you and I (i.e., “humanity”) to get its act together.

What Jesus is talking about with Pilate is a revelation, yet again as he had throughout his life, preaching, and deeds, of what the in-breaking of God’s reign looks like. Therefore, it really bears no resemblance to the worldly conceptualization of control, power, might, authority, and the like — all of which a Roman Governor would have naturally associated with this discussion.

The “other world” is not (pace Augustine) some platonic, actual, and ideal “other world,” but is instead another sense of logic or wisdom against which the logic and wisdom of “this world” stands in contrast. God’s reign, as Jesus demonstrates, does not align with any of the earthly conceptualizations of what it means to be king. So, Christ the King is a reminder — here on this last day of the church year — that what it therefore means for us to be “subjects” or “disciples” of such a king has to do with continually keeping in check the logic and wisdom of the world and instead becoming the servants of all, putting others first, giving voice to the voiceless, prioritizing the needs of the marginalized, visiting the imprisoned, clothing the naked, allowing the last to be first, loving the unlovable, forgiving the unforgivable, and so on and so forth.

These acts, as Jesus lived and modeled them, are the signs of the coming Kingdom — the coming realization of all humanity that this is what God intends for us and how God has always intended us to live.

To talk about Christ the King is to talk about what it means for us to be Christian in a world saturated with the lust for power and the greed for wealth. It means to give everything up so as to inherit the kingdom, to become the servant of all so as to be the greatest among the disciples, and it means be to be like Jesus, the fullest revelation of God, who gives his life for all.

Long live the King!

Photo: Stock

The Will of God: ‘I will not Reject Anyone Who Comes to Me’

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on November 2, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Today is a precious day, one often shaded by the shadow of sadness that arises from our remembrance of those who have gone before us to eternal life. The Feast of All Souls is really the continuation of yesterday’s Feast of All Saint, for we are all — living and deceased — members of the communion of saints, united by the Holy Spirit. This Gospel reading for today’s liturgy is a powerful one indeed and it comes from the Good News according to John:

Jesus said to the crowds:
“Everything that the Father gives me will come to me,
and I will not reject anyone who comes to me,
because I came down from heaven not to do my own will
but the will of the one who sent me.
And this is the will of the one who sent me,
that I should not lose anything of what he gave me,
but that I should raise it on the last day.
For this is the will of my Father,
that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him
may have eternal life,
and I shall raise him on the last day.”

There are, I’m afraid, far too many people who do not believe what it is that Jesus expresses here rather bluntly: God’s will is not to reject anyone, but to welcome all into love and life in God. This is not a call that says we have no free will or cannot choose in some fundamental way to reject the invitation of God’s already always extended offering of love. We can choose something else, but that choice is not God’s will.

People who claim that “so-and-so” is “in hell” or that “so-and-so” is rejected or not loved by God are committing heresy of the most foundational sort. He or she has replaced God (and, more pertinently, the will of God) with him or herself. Such people express condemnation when Jesus, the fullest Revelation of God, has disclosed quite frankly what God’s Will actually is.

In this regard, we hear a corrective in Jesus’s preaching of God’s Self-Disclosure in today’s Gospel. It echoes the recently controversial book, Love Wins by popular preacher Rob Bell, in which he makes an argument for universal salvation. The backlash he received last year was quite astonishing. But at the heart of the discord stood the question: “why do some people care so much about whether one is ‘saved’ or not?” And the bottom line seems to be about control and power – I want to be the one to decides who is in and who is out! want to be the one to be better-than or greater-than another! want to feel special, powerful, right, justified, righteous, and so on!

But it’s not about you or me, it’s about the Love of God, which is — as Scripture reminds us time and again — so far beyond what we can comprehend, we create an idol whenever we claim to know its meaning.

As we remember our loved ones and those we might never have met in this life who have died to this world, but have entered new life in Christ, let us take comfort in Jesus’s words to us in today’s Gospel. And, as importantly, may we be transformed by these words to be instruments of God’s love and peace, rather than idolaters of judgement, fear, and discrimination.

The whole communion of saints, ora pro nobis!

Photo: Stock

MacGyver and the Mustard Seed

Posted in Homilies, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on June 18, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

When I was a kid, my brothers and I loved to watch the ABC TV series MacGyver! There was something about the way he would, regardless of the seemingly impossible situation, the uphill battle he faced, and the lack of resources he had to work with, he would always save the day. He was a little foolish and impractical too, although in my youth I didn’t pick up on that as much as I did on the late 80s early 90s action that drew boys like me to wonder from one episode to the next how the smart independent-contractor-like spy-and-problem-solver-for-hire would get out of this week’s quagmire. This was especially interesting because he was often out-matched, the bad guys would always have guns, bombs, or, in the case of the archenemy Murdoc, a flame-thrower. MacGyver, on the other hand, had a strict no-guns policy — a man committed, in the most improbable way given his line of work, to some form of nonviolence.

Yesterday’s Gospel parable about the mustard seed reminds me a lot of MacGyver. Although, to be fair, Jesus would have likely made a better screenwriter (if you’ve watched some of the old episodes of MacGyver recently on DVD or online, you’ll quickly realize that this was a low-budget, low-quality production compared with what passes for action or suspense programming today).

It might seem silly to think about MacGyver, the character played by Richard Dean Anderson, as having anything to do with Jesus’s parable of the mustard seed, but take a moment to think about this.

Most of us are familiar with Jesus’s initial point: the mustard seed is this itsy-bitsy, tiny, fragile, spec of a seed. It is weak and unimpressive, it is small and easily lost. Here we can relate, as most hearers of this parable do, to the experience of our faith. It starts off small, weak, easily lost, fragile and itsy-bitsy.

Then Jesus says, although the seed begins as “the smallest of all the seeds on the earth,” it grows into this large tree with branches that can support birds of the air and other creatures. Mustard plants are very large, right?

No. False! Mustard plants are, in fact, not large at all (see photo to left). They are more like weeds or small shrubs, and they certainly cannot support the weight of birds, forget about the weight of a bird nest!

So, is Jesus lying to us? Not exactly, we have to remember that he began this little story with the rhetorical question “what parable can we use to describe the kingdom of God?” It is a parable, a narrative designed to flip our expectations upside down and reveal something about who God is and who we are.

What I think is going on here is that Jesus wants to show us that even though our faith might grow into something much larger than the little, tiny mustard seed, the mature faith of a fully grown mustard plant is still weak and fragile and susceptible to all sorts of challenges. Why? Because we always remain human, finite and fallible. Even the holiest and most devoted follower of Christ, someone who strives sincerely to follow the Gospel and live in just relationship to the rest of creation and humanity, will still have a flimsy mustard plant of faith.

Take, for example, Mother Teresa of Calcutta. Here is an undisputedly holy woman (pace Christopher Hitchens, who begged to differ) who lived her whole life serving the ‘poorest of the poor,’ the untouchable caste, those who society left for dead and didn’t even acknowledge existed. Mother Teresa continues to have a positive effect in our world through the amazing work of her community of religious Sisters, the Missionaries of Charity, throughout so many countries including the United States.

When someone looks at the life of Mother Teresa, it would be natural to conclude, using this Gospel parable, that she must have had a large, strong and sturdy mustard plant of faith in order to accomplish such amazing things for the most vulnerable. Yet, in 2008, with the publication of her private journals and letters, the world came to have an intimate glimpse into her spiritual life, which revealed that she struggled for decades with her faith. She was uncertain about what God asked of her and at times even doubted God’s existence. Nevertheless, despite her vulnerable faith, this still-small and weak mustard plant of faith, God was able to do tremendous things through her.

This is how God is so much like the MacGyver of our lives and faith! With few resources (all God has is us) and in seemingly impossible situations (like Mother Teresa’s context in India and elsewhere), God can accomplish amazing things in the world.

We might always have an imperfect faith, an effect of being human, but if we are open to the Holy Spirit, we can help usher in the Kingdom of God in small and large ways alike.

The point of Jesus’s parable is this: the Kingdom of God is like a mustard plant being strong enough to support those around it, the birds of our society, who are in need of shelter, support, love and patience! When we cooperate with God to do tremendous things with our inevitably weak and human faith, God can — like MacGyver in the toughest of circumstances — pull of something amazing, save the day, and bring about good work in the world.

Photo: ABC Network, Stock

‘Fun’ and Today’s Gospel: What Do You Stand For?

Posted in Homilies, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , on June 7, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Have you heard of Fun.? I don’t mean what you do when you laugh and have a good time, but instead mean the popular band whose name is Fun. Many might be familiar with their radio his, “We Are Young,” which seems to be one of the anthems of early summer 2012. Their new album is titled Some Nights, and the title song from the album has me thinking this morning. The refrain to that song has a haunting, if catchy, line that ends each repetition: “what do I stand for? what do I stand for? Some night, I don’t know anymore…”

The reason it’s in my head this morning is because of today’s reading from Mark’s Gospel in which a Scribe approaches Jesus and asks him what the  greatest Law is. In essence, he’s asking Jesus “what do you stand for?” And Jesus has a ready response. He’s a good Jew and so he knows what he stands for because every morning he would repeat this prayer/creed of Judaism. It is called the shema and it is what Jesus says in response to this man: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is the Lord alone” or, as it is more often translated, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is One.” It is a summary of the monotheistic faith, that which distinguishes the people of Israel from other tribes and that which summarizes so much more about what the Jewish people believe.

In naming the Lord (adonai), the shema implicitly recounts the history of God’s revealing God’s Self as the one who is and will be there for the chosen people. It recounts a personal God who is concerned about and cares for all people and creation. It recounts the promises of what’s to come.

Jesus answers the question of what he stands for with the shema and then takes it a step further. He summarizes what is often considered the second part of the Decalogue: the care for neighbor. How exactly does one love the Lord our God? By loving one’s neighbor as one’s self.

This sounds like an easy thing to do, until of course we remember who our neighbor is. Jesus’s parable of the “Good Samaritan” in Luke’s Gospel names the neighbor as the unexpected one, the stranger and enemy of the people. It’s the least likely to be considered neighbor, it is the person we would otherwise choose to not love.

What we stand for is what Jesus stands for: loving God by loving all those people we encounter, the ones who are easy to love and the ones who are not so easy to love.

Like the band Fun, we might go to bed some nights not knowing what we stand for anymore, but let us wake up the next morning like Jesus, prepared to respond to such an inquiry with the Hebrew shema ready at our lips, knowing what we stand for and what it means in terms of our actions and lives. Then, just then, maybe we too will be like the Scribe in the Gospel and Jesus can say to us as well: “you are not far from the Kingdom of God.”

Photo: Stock

Jesus, Peter and the Meaning of ‘Love’

Posted in Homilies, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , on May 25, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

This reflection is now available in Daniel P. Horan, OFM’s book Franciscan Spirituality for the 21st Century: Selected Reflections from the Dating God Blog and Other Essays, Volume One (Koinonia Press, 2013).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 396 other followers

%d bloggers like this: