Archive for April, 2012

On Becoming Good Sheep

Posted in Homilies, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on April 30, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Yesterday we the Church celebrated the Fourth Sunday of Easter, which is annually referred to as “Good Shepherd Sunday,” because the Gospel — in all three of the Lectionary Cycles — always comes from part of Jesus’s “Good Shepherd discourse” in the tenth chapter of the Gospel according to John. In John’s Gospel, we are told by Jesus himself that Jesus is the Good Shepherd, and the reason why he is the Good Shepherd is that he lays down his life for his sheep.

If you’re at all like me, sometimes when hearing a reading during Mass that I am fairly familiar with, it can be easy to “zone out” or think to one’s self “Oh, ‘Good Shepherd,’ I know this story…I know how this ends” and then gloss over the proclamation of the Word until, like those awoken from a standing sleep, we instinctively say together “Praise by to You, Lord Jesus Christ” and sit down.

One of the things that I think gets lost on us who have become so accustomed to the pericopes of Scripture is the absurdity, foolishness and startling quality of Jesus’s words, which reveal a powerful Truth of who God is and how God loves.

Take the definition of the Good Shepherd, for instance. What shepherd in what setting would ever be expected to die for his or her sheep in order to be known as “good” at his or her job? See, this is precisely the point. The distinction Jesus makes between himself (the Good Shepherd) and a “hired helper” is an important clue to how he is changing the expectations of his hearers. For the way he describes the hired helper is precisely what a shepherd does: tend sheep to make a living. To say that a good shepherd is one that lays down his or her life for the sheep is as ridiculous as saying a good car salesperson lays down her life for her Ford Taurus! Or that a good pretzel salesperson dies for his pretzel cart!

Shepherds would be expected to care for, tend, and protect their sheep insofar as they were able, but to die for their livelihood in the face of real danger? Not so much.

So why does Jesus say this?

I believe it has a lot to do with turning the expectations of his listeners upside-down. In addition to Jesus foretelling his impending betrayal and crucifixion, and his willingness to do so for the sake of his Flock, he is also revealing that the love of God is so abundant, so gratuitous, so overwhelming that it defies any possible expectation we might imagine. God’s love is so large that it appears irrational, foolish and even unreasonable to us — just as a shepherd dying for his sheep would appear to Jesus’s audience.

It is in the spirit of Jesus’s turning his hearers’ expectations upside down that I have proposed that this week, following the Good Shepherd Sunday, become known as “Good Sheep Week.” That we revisit the Sacred Scripture passages from this Sunday to see the clues to becoming what we might call “Good Sheep” as those who follow the one, Good Shepherd. We already know what makes Jesus the Good Shepherd, he tells us in the Gospel, but do we know what makes “Good Sheep?”

1. Good Sheep are Humble and Hopeful

This insight comes through in the First Reading from the Acts of the Apostles (4:8-12), where we encounter Peter in mid-narrative. He is receiving all sorts of credit and attention for what he and the early followers of Jesus are doing: healing, preaching, conversion, good works, etc.

Instead of taking personal credit for the good works he is doing, he refers his listeners instead to the source of all good gifts: God in Jesus Christ. He explains that the healing is done in Jesus’s name and lives out a stance of humility that allows him to become an instrument of God’s good action in the world, while giving all credit to God. A good sheep lives similarly, following the example of Peter in Acts, aware of the goodness of God’s gifts in his or her life and world.

But there is a second point that comes toward the end of this passage when Peter talks about the Salvation that has also been given to us in Christ Jesus. This is the source of hope that grounds the good sheep in their daily lives. Aware of what Christ as already accomplished for us, good sheep reflect that hope in a world that is in desperate need of good news (i.e., “The Gospel”). A good sheep is hopeful.

2. Good Sheep are Part of a Flock

There is no such thing as a solo good sheep! Nor are there independent-contracting good sheep! Good sheep know that they are part of a flock. We hear this insight in the Letter of John, the second reading, in which we are told that we are all “Children of God now.” We share a connection, a union, a family bond in God as children and with Christ as brothers and sisters. What is often missed in that assertion is how we children of God. It is not who we are, what we do, what we think, with whom we associate, and so on — the Scripture says that it is simply God’s love that makes us who we are. But good sheep must come to recognize that relationship as a member of God’s family.

This comes through strongly in the Gospel, when Jesus uses the flock imagery to describe who is “in” and who is “out.” Jesus tells us that there are other sheep that do not appear to be in this flock, but nevertheless they are part of it, because there is one shepherd, the Good Shepherd, and one flock, His flock!

We need to be aware of this today as it is often far too easy to exclude others, to pretend so-and-so or “this or that type of person” is not part of this flock. But that is our division and our fabrication, as children of God loved into existence, we are all part of the flock. And we should live that way. Good sheep come to recognize their relatedness to the stranger, the other, those with whom we disagree, and those we choose to ignore, and  the good sheep sees a kindred sheep in that person, recognizing they are all part of the same flock.

3. Good Sheep Hear the Shepherd’s Voice and Know Him

Jesus tells us in John’s Gospel that He knows his sheep and they know Him; they hear his voice and know Him. But do we hear the voice of the Good Shepherd today? To we know how to recognize it?

I think it’s very difficult to hear the voice of the Good Shepherd today, not because His voice is quiet or challenging in its own right to find, but because we are bombarded by far too many voices in our world. Voices of other shepherds that Jesus warns us of in the Gospel, shepherds who are only in their ‘line of work’ for themselves, for money, for ulterior motives. They do not actually care for their sheep, let alone risk their whole lives for the sheep. We find these other shepherds all over the place in every sphere of our social, cultural, political, religious, familial, and work lives. And this makes it very difficult to recognize the voice of the one, Good Shepherd.

See, the thing about hearing the voice of the Good Shepherd, is that it requires our attentive listening. And listening takes work. Good sheep set aside time, make space, create an environment in which they can learn to hear the voice of the Good Shepherd so that they know where to go. This can happen at Church, throughout one’s day, during a retreat or day of recollection or the like, but it needs to be intentional. Good Sheep listen in order to hear and recognize the voice of the Good Shepherd and follow His lead in life.

May you have a blessed “Good Sheep Week” and come to live with humility and hope, recognize our shared relationship as Children of God and sheep of the one flock of Christ, and take time to listen and hear the voice of the Good Shepherd who is always there calling us and leading us to the green pastures of salvation.

Photo: Stock

Book Signing in Triangle, Virginia This Weekend

Posted in Dating God Book, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 28, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

For those who happen to live in the greater Washington, DC area or Northern Virginia, just wanted to let you know that in addition to preaching at all the Masses this weekend at St. Francis of Assisi Church in Triangle, Va., the parish will be hosting a book-signing event throughout the weekend where you can purchase a copy of Dating God: Live and Love in the Way of St. Francis for the discounted price of $10 (that’s 33% off the list price!).  The signing will take place in the vestibule of the church after each of the masses this weekend. Here are the times

  • Saturday Vigil (4/28) 5:30 pm
  • Sunday (4/29) 8:00 am
  • Sunday (4/29) 9:30 pm
  • Sunday (4/29) 12:00 pm
  • Sunday (4/29) 5:30 pm

Looking forward to the weekend — hope to see you at Mass and afterward at the book table!  Peace and good!

 Photo: Br. Dan signing at St. Bonaventure University

Video Clips from Franciscan Mission Service ‘Souposium’

Posted in Dating God Book, Franciscan Spirituality, Social Justice, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on April 27, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Back at the end of February I gave a public talk at Franciscan Mission Service (FMS) in Washington, DC, titled, “What Does it Mean to ‘Date’ God? Prayer as Relationship in the Franciscan Tradition.” It was part of the regular Souposium series that FMS sponsors throughout the year, which offers a public lecture hosted at the FMS main building and includes a homemade dinner of various soups, breads and desserts. FMS has recently published a few video excerpts from my talk, and you can find earlier videos on the FMS website from other talks. Here is the description of my talk as posted on the FMS website.

The idea of “Dating” God is a rather unusual concept. For many people such an image can be a challenge or even a problem, just as images used to describe God throughout the Christian tradition (“Father,” “Friend,” “Lover,” etc.) assist the spiritual lives of some, while hindering the pilgrimage of prayer and faith for others. In this reflection, Br. Dan shared what he means by this new image for imagining one’s relationship with God as it is presented in his new book, Dating God: Live and Love in the Way of St. Francis (St. Anthony Messenger Press, 2012), and explained how it ties into the rich and inspiring Franciscan tradition. Central to appreciating this different way of viewing spirituality is an embrace of the notion that our prayer can be more than something we simply do, but could be imagined as a more dynamic relationship with the Divine.

Enjoy these videos!

Video Clip One

Video Clip Two

Video Clip Three

Fr. James Martin, SJ’s #WhatSistersMeanToMe Campaign

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 26, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Here is an excerpt from Fr. James Martin’s guest column on the Washington Post’s “On Faith” page. Like so many others, Fr. Martin has been reflecting on his gratitude for women religious in his life and has been encouraging others to do likewise. You can read more inspirational reflections on twitter by following this new hashtag of gratitude. He acknowledges how some very negative critics — who consider themselves Catholics in good standing, including one notoriously vitriolic and oftentimes disrespectful priest who has a rather loyal following online — have attempted to hijack the hashtag of gratitude to harass the LCWR and others in support of the more-than 80% of United States women religious who are affected by the latest news. Read the entire column below to learn more.

Last week, on the day when the Vatican released the results of its investigation of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which represents 80 percent of women’s religious orders in this country, I received emails from several Catholic sisters. All described themselves as saddened, stunned or demoralized by the Vatican document, which severely criticized the LWCR in a number of areas.

Catholic sisters are my heroes. They have been my teachers, spiritual directors, mentors, bosses and friends. I can barely begin to describe the admiration I have for these women, many of them now in their 70s and 80s, and for what that they have done for God, for the church, for what Catholics call the “people of God,” and for me.

When I was a young Jesuit working in Nairobi, Kenya, for example, two elderly Maryknoll sisters patiently listened to my worries about living in the developing world, shared some of their own experiences of years in ministry in remote villages, and encouraged me to “push on,” as they say in East Africa. When my father was dying of cancer ten years ago, one Religious of Jesus and Mary sister took a four-hour train ride to visit him in the hospital for an hour, stayed overnight at a nearby convent, and the next morning took the train home, for another four-hour journey. When I thanked her, she thanked me for the “honor” of letting her come. And during a difficult spiritual crisis, one Sister of St. Joseph helped me to find God in the midst of my doubts, and was even able to get me to smile. “God did all the work,” she said, when I thanked her, “not me.”

In the wake of the Vatican document, my sister friends, some nearing the end of their lives, seemed to need a word of gratitude. The very least I could do was to show some support in a small way–on Twitter. (Of course I had written about my admiration for them before, but it seemed that it was a particularly good time for praise.) Besides, gratitude is always in season…

To Read more, go to: “What Sisters Mean to Me.”

For an earlier story from the Huffington Post on the same topic, go to: “Rev. James Martin…

Photo: University of San Francisco

Gary Wills Writes about Religious Sisters at ‘New York Review of Books’

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on April 25, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

The always eloquent, if at times controversial, historian and author Gary Wills has written a reflection on Catholic Religious Women over at the New York Review of Books that is heartfelt and direct, expressing his take on the recent report from the Vatican’s dicastery that deals with doctrine (the CDF) on the LCWR (leadership conference of women religious). His short piece, titled “Bullying the Nuns,” includes his personal experience of sisters that had made an indelible impact on his life for the better. He laments the move on the part of the CDF and struggles to make sense of the recent formal engagement the Vatican has had with a schismatic group known as the Society of Saint Pius X, while at the same time publicly chiding many women religious in the United States. Whether you agree with his take or not, he offers some food for thought and a personal testimony worth considering. Here are some excerpts:

The Vatican has issued a harsh statement claiming that American nuns do not follow their bishops’ thinking. That statement is profoundly true. Thank God, they don’t. Nuns have always had a different set of priorities from that of bishops. The bishops are interested in power. The nuns are interested in the powerless. Nuns have preserved Gospel values while bishops have been perverting them. The priests drive their own new cars, while nuns ride the bus (always in pairs). The priests specialize in arrogance, the nuns in humility…

Anne O’Connor was just the kind of nun the Vatican is now intent on punishing. She had been a social worker before she became a nun, work that she loved and went back to several times as a Dominican. She was quick to shed the old habit (which was designed to disguise the fact that there was a woman somewhere in that voluminous disguising of hair, breasts, and hips), and quick to take back her own name. After she took on several high offices in her order, she became the mother provincial of the California branch of the Dominican order during the 1960s, coping with the changes of that volatile era on her college campuses.

Now the Vatican says that nuns are too interested in “the social Gospel” (which is the Gospel), when they should be more interested in Gospel teachings about abortion and contraception (which do not exist). Nuns were quick to respond to the AIDS crisis, and to the spiritual needs of gay people—which earned them an earlier rebuke from Rome. They were active in the civil rights movement. They ran soup kitchens…

To read more, go here.

Photo: File

The Paradox of ‘True and Perfect Joy’

Posted in Franciscan Spirituality with tags , , , on April 23, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

Given the events of recent days, this parable of St. Francis, titled True and Perfect Joy, dictated by Francis to his brothers toward the end of his life, seems to be worth considering. I hope the wisdom of the Poverello speaks to your hearts as it does to mine.

A Selection from True and Perfect Joy of St. Francis of Assisi

Brother Leo asked Francis: “What is true joy?”

Francis said: “I return from Perugia and arrive here in the dead of night. It’s winter time, muddy, and so cold that icicles have formed on the edges of my habit…I come to the gate and, after I’ve knocked and called for some time, a brother comes and asks: ‘who are you?’

‘Brother Francis,’ I answer.

‘Go Away!’ he says. ‘This is not a decent hour to be wandering about! You may not come in!’  When I insist he replies, ‘Go Away! You are simple and stupid! Don’t come back to us again! There are many of us here like you — we don’t need you!’ I stand at the door and say: ‘For the love of God, take me in tonight!’ and he replies: ‘I will not! Go to another monastery and ask there!’

I tell you this: If I had patience and did not become upset, true joy, as well as true virtue and the salvation of my soul, would consist in this.”

Photo: Stock

Standing With our Sisters: Initial Comment on CDF and LCWR

Posted in LCWR with tags , , , , , , , , on April 23, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

I was, of all places, in Assisi, Italy, when I first heard the news of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s (CDF) report Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which levels serious — if ultimately misguided — critique at the leaders of the majority of women’s religious communities in the United States. Having only recently returned from a European academic-conference tour in the United Kingdom and Italy, I’m still working to catch up on the news, read the documents and commentaries, and form a constructive response to the CDF’s move. I will refrain from offering a full response at this time, due to the fact that my examination of the materials has only been cursory, and instead simply wish to express my solidarity with my sisters in religious life.

Even an initial review of the CDF’s materials and Cardinal Levada’s summary letter leads an informed and knowledgeable reader to conclude that there is much more to the story than at first meets the eye. There will be many who will unthinkingly “go with the flow” of such “concerns,” choosing to capitulate to the pressures of accepting caricature in place of factuality, and uncharitable assumption in place of truth. Fear is a powerful motivator, perhaps the most influential in our human society. My hope is that women and men of faith, especially the male religious and diocesan priests of this country, will find the strength of the Spirit to overcome the fear of subsequent reprisal and stand up with charity and respect for the ministry, Gospel witness, prophetic example and holiness of these women who are, quite frankly, undeservedly criticized. As has been said by many women and men I have spoken with in the last few days in Italy and in the United States, this appears to be an attempt to regain or maintain an antiquated and paternalistic form of control, motivated by the fear that certain iterations of patriarchal hegemony are indeed dissolving in the Church and world. Is that the real fear? What is really behind this sort of move?

The initial reading of the report suggests, to me at least, that there remains an inadequate appreciation on the part of the report’s authors for the complexities of intelligent, critical and reflective thought necessary to be a minister in the Church today, especially in the United States, which is not afforded the luxury of a tiny and insulated oikos of ecclesiastical hegemony. One is led to believe that there is a grievous confusion on the part of the text’s authors between charitable critical reflection that perhaps challenges antiquated or inept systems of ministry or engagement with the world and so-called dissent, which appears to be the specter of accusation most centrally leveled at the sisters. In our twenty-first-century world women as well as men are to be granted the inherent right to use their God-given intellectual faculties for the service of God and God’s People, which is the Church. That a concern about the free exercise of the sisters’ ability to discuss, reflect, pray about and discern complex and timely matters of theological, social and moral import serves as a primary impetus for this report is troubling.

At this point, this is all I will say about the document(s) until I have the opportunity to examine them in greater detail. In the meantime, I wish to extend to my sisters in religious life my support, my prayers and my solidarity — I hope that all others will too, especially those of us men in religious life who belong to the sibling organization the Conference of Major Superiors of Men (CMSM). This is a challenging time for those in religious life to wisely, respectfully and strongly maintain the millennia-old responsibility of religious life to recognize the twofold position of religious to (a) remain faithful to the Body of Christ, which is the Church; and (b) remain prophetic in the challenging spirit that initially called women and men into a particular charismatic life and vocation of religious community in the Catholic Church.

Photo: RNS

Dispatches from the Road: Assisi 2012

Posted in Franciscan Spirituality, Uncategorized with tags , , , on April 19, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

So the travel schedule and jam-packed conference days — not to mention the rather spotty internet service here in Assisi — has made it a bit difficult to post here with as much regularity I would have liked, but here’s at least a little something. For those who don’t know, I’ve traveled from Great Britain where I was participating in an academic conference on Thomas Merton to Assisi, Italy, where I am participating in a conference sponsored by the Ecclesiological Investigations International Research Network, which features scholars from a variety of traditions and fields from around the world.

To report on everything that has happened, all the paper sessions I’ve attended and plenary addresses that have been delivered, would take far too much time. So I will instead try to give you an overview.

Things kicked off with a prayer service at St. Mary of the Angels Basilica in the lower part or valley of Assisi. This is the Basilica in which the Portiuncula is housed. It is the mother church of the Order of Friars Minor and most of the conference is taking place next door to this great site.

From then on it has been a whirlwind of exciting papers, engaging plenary addresses, organized sight seeing at the holiest sites of the Franciscan world, and meals, discussions and all-around fun times. It is an exhausting schedule, but well-worth it. The ideas shared, the hopes anticipated and the trajectories illuminated make the lack of sleep and the constant running around well worth it!

One of the most interesting sessions I’ve attended so far was a concurrent paper session on the Church. The three presenters included Brian Flanagan (“The Holiness of the Church: Mark of Division or Unity?”), Pieson Shaw (“The Necessity of an Ecclesiology in Which the Church is Understood as Sacrament with Christ as Primary Sacrament: Ways to Convergence in Ecumenical Dialogue”), and Scott MacDougall (“Anticipated Communion: Ecumenism and Eschatological Ecclesiology”).  All three papers were very well presented and engendered a lively conversation. It was an amazing discussion if only because of the diverse — and preeminent (myself excluded) — group gathered in an intimate setting (there were about 25 of us in the room). Among those in attendance were three leading American ecclesiologists: Roger Haight, Richard Gaillardetz and Dennis Doyle. This doesn’t even begin to include the other renowned scholars in the tiny room, professors from around the world and leading universities. What was most remarkable was that the third paper, by Scott MacDougall, drew heavily on the work of Roger Haight as a starting point and developed Haight’s thought further in a new and constructive direction…all while Haight sat a few feet away.  Those moments of real dialogue and exchange always make for exciting experiences for all involved.

That evening was spent in Upper Assisi at the Basilica of St. Francis, where we celebrated evening prayer together after hearing a plenary address in Italian (simultaneously translated into English) by a Conventual Franciscan on the subject of dialogue. The evening prayer concluded with a procession to the tomb of St. Francis — all done after the Basilica was closed, so the 200+ conference attendees had the Church to ourselves.

Thursday morning began with prayer at the Basilica of St. Clare in Upper Assisi, followed by several paper sessions. I attended one on the subject of ecology and dialogue. It was a great collection of papers by a diverse group (including both a Franciscan and a Dominican sister). The presenters included Aaron Hollander, Geraldine Smyth OP, Dawn Nothwehr OSF, and John Njroge.

Part of the afternoon was designed to intentionally be available for exploring the holy places in Assisi. It so happened that those of us conference participants would occasionally run into each other, catching the eye of the others with the easily recognizable bright-orange lanyard on which hung our name tags, and wonderful impromptu theological discussions were known to break out. One such discussion too place near the Piazza of San Rufino on the nature of Christian anthropology, free will, sin and grace — it included three people from the United States, one from Poland and one from Italy.

This evening it is my turn to present my paper, “Thomas Merton’s Franciscan Model of Interreligious Dialogue,” in a panel with Michael Barnes SJ of England, Bishop Kyrillos Katerelos of Greece, and Professor Sandra Mazzolini of Italy.

Hopefully I will be able to post more in the not-so-distant future. Until then, Peace and good!

Photo: Dan Horan, OFM in front of the Basilica of St. Francis of Assisi

Dispatches from the Road: Greetings from Oxford

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on April 16, 2012 by Daniel P. Horan, OFM

This is a deliberately short note to say hello and send my regards from Oxford, UK (this photo was taken this afternoon on the meadow of Christ Church) during my last day in the UK before heading to Italy tomorrow AM for the second conference this week. The 2012 Thomas Merton Society of Great Britain and Ireland conference at Oakham, UK, went swimmingly and was — as usual — a wonderful event! I hope to write a lengthier post about the remainder of that experience at sometime in the not-so-distant future. Until them cheers!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers

%d bloggers like this: